Image hosting by Photobucket
Open Mic Wednesday


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2007 May
2006 October
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February

My Links
Filbert
The Jongleur

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog






Open Mic Wednesday
04.06.05 (11:34 pm)   [edit]
Image hosted by Photobucket.comThere is a scene in John Steinbeck's [u]The Grapes of Wrath[/u] that breaks my heart. In it, the migrant workers, (who have been forced off their land at the hand of the great drought they cannot combat, the failure of a stock market they do not understand and a system of corporate ownership that values profits over humanity), must make choices about what things they will carry with them on their journey to a new life many thousands of miles away. Their plight is made even more desperate by the fact that the space to carry belongings on the journey is very limited, so often only the bare necessities can be gathered up... the rest are burned in a primitive ceremony that allows the simple people to pretend that they have control over at least one aspect of their fate.

The most chilling part of the scene for me is when the children are told they must choose two things to take with them.... and the rest will burn. Two things.

As the farmers gather around the fire they ask themselves "How can we live without our lives? How will we know it's us without our past?" As beautiful as Steinbeck's novel is, these questions are never really answered.

Reading over this scene, I cannot help but ask myself, what two things would I take? How would I draw the line between what is important and what is essential? I don't consider myself a very materialistic person, and yet these are the kinds of choices that people write novels, and dare I say poetry, about.

What would I take? What would you?

In truth, the answer to this question changes frequently. Sometimes, the practical me steps forward and my list includes things like my mother's bible complete with an entire family lineage and an envelope with documents that in a situation defined by a lack of control, suddenly seem very rigid and steadfast. But it's only a few moments later that I find my thoughts wandering to the stuffed lamb that my father bought the day I was born... or the black and white photo of my mother playing guitar with Paul Stoogey when she was only 17... or even the extaordinarily large black cowboy hat stolen from a biology lab during a fit of madness that now sits atop my computer monitor... and I know I'd never be able to part with any of them.

Tonight, however, the items in my satchel, should I ever be faced with such a choice, seem less important than the destination itself. Deep down I know it's not the *things* that are important to me, but the meaning that swirls around them and the things they represent. And when I really think about it, it's the people that I love who define the magic that sparkles around those items... it's the smiles that flash across their faces, the big round tears that leak through their fingers or the quiet laugh that lingers long after the phone has been hung up that really makes up the fabric of who I am... not the items I've collected over the course of my relatively small life.

That said... just in case, I think I'll take that tattered white lamb and black and white photo, along with a couple of other key items, and hide them in the bowl of that extra large hat, should I ever find that I need them in a hurry. And when I show up on your porch (in the pouring rain and prepared to stay forever), with my loot, we can blame it on Steinbeck.

In the meantime, (even though it's technically no longer Wednesday), perhaps it's not too late to draw your own line in the sand between what only seems important and what is truly essential.
 


posted by: lindy (reply)
post date: 04.06.05 (8:56 pm)

I always have the easiest (and most precious) default in the world... I'd be scooping up kids and cats, an arm full to be sure...

Materially... since I can't carry my extra snuggly kind size bed...

I will go with my photo albums and yearbooks. And my music... oh man! *sock in the gut... what about my vinyl?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!



posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 04.06.05 (9:02 pm)

Reply to: lindy

I always have to decide that no music will go... choosing only one or two cds would, for me, be like choosing between one of my kids. How could I take some and not the other? It's like a REALLY superficial Sophie's Choice - minus all the oscar potential of course. :)

Speaking of which, good choice taking the kids. They'll be releaved. :)

Thanks for being here tonight. You rock, my friend.

j



posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 04.06.05 (9:03 pm)

Reply to: juniperflux

*ahem*

Of course, I mean relieved above.

Just testing you.

j



posted by: lindy (reply)
post date: 04.06.05 (9:07 pm)

Reply to: juniperflux

at least you didn't spell it R-O-L-A-I-D-S... hahaha.

No music eh? wow. When my marriage ended, I gave up all the furniture, household items, cars, everything as long as I could have the msuic. I'd say I got the better end of the deal...

thank you for having me here. :)

I enjoyed this post as it got me all kinds of thinking and feeling.



posted by: cmaze (reply)
post date: 04.06.05 (9:12 pm)

Wow. This post was actually quite moving. While I have yet to read the novel of which you speak, I can relate very much to what you have explained. I love the way you finish with "we can blame it on Steinbeck."

Anyway, I find myself wanting to answer this question of importance. I have never been materialistic myself, but on the same note, there are thos things that may be material, but are filled with the magic of life.

At this point in my life, I really do not know what I would take with me. I believe that I would leave most, if not all, material things behind...for none are essential to me.

The only things that I have to take are my memories. Mostly, the memories of the pictures I took with my mom at a young age, the postcards I had recieved, the music I listened to, and the poetry I had written that was destroyed by anothers hand so long ago. This experience was the most important role that had been played in my life. I learned the meaning of 'importance' and 'essential' with such vividness that I almost cracked. In fact, I did crack.

That is what I will always have though, the good times. The pictures, postcards, music, friends, and family. I need nothing else.



posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 04.06.05 (9:16 pm)

Reply to: lindy

Well... if I could take ALL my music, believe me, it's going... but when boiling it down to two things, I'd just rather have none. Plus... it could all be replaced, I think. It might be hard... but it could.





posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 04.06.05 (9:18 pm)

Reply to: cmaze

Chris... you seem surprised that it's moving?? :)

Seriously, your response is thoughtful and thought provoking. You've adopted a zen aesthetic that I admire. I know the true valuables are really in me... but sometimes I think I lack the confidence to see them.

Thanks for stopping by...

And than you Lindy for leading this horse to water.

j



posted by: BerlinBear (reply)
post date: 04.07.05 (12:30 am)

Reply to: juniperflux

Oh thank goodness. I was already beginning to wonder whether lindy's kids were trees. But then, I wouldn't be that surprised, now that I know that lindy is an egg and a teletubbie impersonator. ;-)



posted by: BerlinBear (reply)
post date: 04.07.05 (12:35 am)

OK, so first things first, I have no idea what I would take. I would *definitely* leave behind my thesis. It would be the perfect excuse. As for what I'd take, no idea.

But what actually made me respond to this post was this line:
"In it, the migrant workers, (who have been forced off their land at the hand of the great drought they cannot combat, the failure of a stock market they do not understand and a system of corporate ownership that values profits over humanity)"
When you boil it down like that, Steinbeck looks like an omniscient prophet. I'm sure he'd be dismayed to see how right he got it. That had not really struck me when I read it a few years ago. Great novel though. I can also recommend "Travels with Charley" by the same author.



posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 04.07.05 (1:16 am)

Reply to: BerlinBear

Clearly, you two have a relationship I do not understand. :)



posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 04.07.05 (1:19 am)

Reply to: BerlinBear

First of all... I had to laugh at your comment regarding your thesis. Well put.

And secondly... I think Steinbeck would be a bit dismayed, although I find Grapes to be a scathing commentary of all thing capitalist.. which is what lead to much of the controversy that has swarmed around it for the 65+ years in which it has sat in judgement of a system that clearly does not work. In short, I think he'd hate that he was right, but wouldn't be terribly surprised.

Thanks for the comment.

j



posted by: BerlinBear (reply)
post date: 04.07.05 (2:30 am)

Reply to: juniperflux

Sorry, you need to read my comments on Lindy's latest post about lace to make any sense of that at all. The trees thing was a reference to your typo, which had Lindy's kids being re-leaved. Or maybe you got that and are just taking the piss? I'm lost, and it's my comment. How must the others feel?



posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 04.07.05 (2:43 am)

Reply to: BerlinBear

Na... Lindy's relationships are something I usually attempt to avoid understanding... it's better that way.

Releaved... *sigh* :)

You're a funny guy.

j



posted by: BerlinBear (reply)
post date: 04.07.05 (2:46 am)

Reply to: juniperflux

Why thank you.
*gracious bow*



posted by: BerlinBear (reply)
post date: 04.07.05 (2:47 am)

Oh, and, I have just dedicated a post to you which I thought you'd like, given our linguistic-type discussions the other day



posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 04.07.05 (3:50 am)

Reply to: BerlinBear


Ooooooh! How lovely.

I hardly ever get posts dedicated to me, you know?

*rubs hands together*

j



posted by: chicalookate (reply)
post date: 04.07.05 (9:15 am)

I see journals from all over the world and the one of the subjects covered frequently is that of the numerous refugees in the world. Not something we see in the U.S. press. These are people who are often lucky to escape with their lives, let alone any possessions. It makes one realize how lucky we are.

If I had to flee or my house was on fire I can't think of much I would grab. My cat, a few photos and that is about it. I have made an effort to purge a lot of my material possessions. Even my books and music I know I could probably replace if I wanted.

Great post btw



posted by: surrogate (reply)
post date: 04.07.05 (5:23 pm)

My life has forced me to make such choices in the past few years. In the end I decided, in fact, on two things and let all the rest go - though some of the booty still exists in the homes of relatives and friends. My choices were simple though once I got to thinking about it, and I've not regretted making the decision that lead to parting with my material things. It's taught me that they really didn't mean as nuch to me as I thought they did all those years. Hell, I don't even really miss even the things that I once thought of as symbolic of my life and it's rich past.

I got to choose two things.

And what's funny is that had I opted to keep the rest, I'd have lost what I kept...and I think I got the better end of the deal.

I kept my mind, and I kept my heart.



posted by: adpierin11 (reply)
post date: 04.08.05 (6:20 am)

as long as i have my family, my friends, and my dog (s) then I am fine....



posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 04.09.05 (10:21 pm)

Reply to: chicalookate

Thanks, Kate... you make an excellent point about refugees and the fact that the only news we ever hear about them is usually something spun to make a point about imigration.

Thanks for your comment. As always, insightful.

j



posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 04.09.05 (10:23 pm)

Reply to: surrogate


Clearly, those are the things that really matter. It's tough, I find, to let go of things that are dipped in specific memories. Even touching them seems to transport me back to a certain spot and moment. But... in the end, it's not the *thing* that matters, but the who and why. That said, I think you made the right choice, kiddo.

j



posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 04.09.05 (10:24 pm)

Reply to: adpierin11

True. Although sometimes I might be tempted to put my dogs at the head of that list. ;-)

j



posted by: surrogate (reply)
post date: 04.10.05 (9:48 am)

Reply to: juniperflux
I agree with your comment, though, thankfully, I've found I don't need the "things" to keep the memories alive, warm, and just as cherished as they've ever been.



posted by: newbie (reply)
post date: 04.14.05 (5:21 pm)

Reply to: BerlinBear

loooooool. Trees? hahahaha... whatever do you mean, Mr. Bear?!?!?! hahahahaha....



posted by: newbie (reply)
post date: 04.14.05 (5:22 pm)

Reply to: juniperflux

psssssttt... I don't understand it either. ;)

Your Name:


Your Comment: