Image hosting by Photobucket
All I Can Do Is Shake My Head...


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2007 May
2006 October
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February

My Links
Filbert
The Jongleur

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog






All I Can Do Is Shake My Head...
03.26.05 (12:57 am)   [edit]
Image hosted by Photobucket.comBecause this article was featured on the [url=www.yahoo.com]Yahoo homepage [/url] the other day, it is quite possible that a number of you saw it. Quite frankly, I was a little surpised when I read it, because prior to seeing this, I had not heard a thing about the lawsuit that is at the center of the controversy outlined in the article. In fact, a friend and I were just discussing the other day how *little* we had heard lately about the RIAA's mad rampage to destroy teenagers with computers. Apparently, however, those maniacal mainstream music execs are just as busy as ever; and as the title of this post indicates, I have to admit that I find the entire thing to be just a bit more than a little disgusting. Anyway, because I know many of you refuse, out of sheer principle I suppose, to click and read the entire thing, let me give you the highlights:



[i][b]File-Sharing Case Worries Indie Artists [/b][/i]
[i]By ALEX VEIGA, AP Business Writer [/i]

[i]LOS ANGELES - Recording industry executive Andy Gershon sees opportunity in the online file-sharing networks that most of his rivals decry as havens for music pirates. As president of V2 Records, home to such established acts as The White Stripes and Moby, Gershon mines such Internet distribution channels for new fans and revenues. "The cat is so far out of the bag and so far gone that it's pointless to keep fighting it," Gershon said. "I might as well make as many people fans of our music, whether they illegally download it or not." [/i]



Bravo! I simply do not know when the music industry is going to pull their collective head out of their collective *cough* arse (note the British accent there ~ *ahem NOT Liverpool*) and figure out that file sharing is not going to go away and fighting it only seeks to further alienate just about every music fan over the age of 14. The article goes on...


[i]A number of mostly independent recording artists and labels have experimented with and embraced the freewheeling digital distribution that the Internet affords. And many worry that a victory by major recording companies in a landmark file-sharing case now before the U.S. Supreme Court could short-circuit the very technologies that they believe are making a more level playing field of the music business.

Several artist rights associations, music publishers and well-known musicians, including Don Henley, Sheryl Crow and the Dixie Chicks are backing the major recording labels, which accuse Grokster and StreamCast [which distributes Morpheus] of profiting from a business model that depends on piracy. [/i]


Yay! Another reason to hate Sheryl Crow and The Dixie Chicks!


[i]But some artists, including Wilco frontman Jeff Tweedy, see an upside to file-sharing. "I look at it as a library. I look at it as our version of the radio," Tweedy said.

"It's a place where basically we can encourage fans to be fans and not feel like they're being exploited, which is basically what the whole industry is geared to do."

About 20 independent recording artists, including musician and producer Brian Eno, rockers Heart and rapper-activist Chuck D, filed a legal brief with the high court in support of Grokster and StreamCast. They insist file-sharing and related technologies help expose new audiences to their music — outside established channels of the recording labels. [/i]


Yay! Another reason to love Wilco and Brian Eno!

The artists argue that file-sharing "has the immediate potential to develop into a significantly more prevalent alternative distribution and promotion system." But a ruling that outlaws or limits it "will block that potential from ever being fully realized," the brief contends.


It goes on... and if you're interested in the rest, you can always click here.

But all of this makes me wonder.

I know that I personally do not download nearly the amount of music that I used to. When Napster first hit the ground running, I was like a kid in a candy store, and I later turned to Kazaa (Lite of course) to get my file sharing fix. But in the end, I just find downloading to be far less satisfying than purchasing the real thing. For me, there is nothing like ripping the plastic off a new CD and perusing the pages of the liner notes for the first time as the disc takes its first spin in the player. It's simply the best kind of magic.

But then again... I know that I am often in the minority when it comes to my views on music and its place in my life.

So... here's my question? Do you still download? Are you a P2P freak who cannot get enough of all that digital goodness or are you keeping a low profile in constant fear that the RIAA is going to come knocking at the door armed with a search warrant with your hard drive's name on it?

Come on... 'fess up. Your secret's safe with me.

 


posted by: lindy (reply)
post date: 03.25.05 (10:53 pm)

looool. Your secret's safe with me and the hundred's of thousands who wander through this place.

When I DJ'd, honestly, I insisted on buying all my music. It helped that my company paid for everything I bought. Now, I do download a fair share. The only thing stopping me at this point is that I'm running out of memory on this old pc. Having said that, the majority of what I download is music I already own, but I want to play it on a site or my blog. So, there you go.



posted by: akira25 (reply)
post date: 03.26.05 (1:38 am)

i stopped downloading since my pc doesn't have that enuf memory to store all my fave songs...lol



posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 03.26.05 (7:39 am)

Reply to: lindy

Well... that certainly makes sense. In the end, I just like owning the CD myself and adding it to my massive collection. Someday I'll blog about my music collection, although I have to admit, it's sorta embarrasing. :)





posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 03.26.05 (7:39 am)

Reply to: akira25

Well... that is certainly a practical reason to stop. :) Thanks for the comment and for stopping by!

j



posted by: brogonzo (reply)
post date: 03.26.05 (8:00 am)

I don't download nearly as much as I used to -- it was big when Napster came out, and then there was a major peak when my family first got broadband.

But now I have my own computer, my own hard drive, and my own broadband connection... and I only download music if there's a song I'm REALLY dying to hear... probably one or two a week, really.

Downloading really isn't as satisfying. A lot of times, I'll buy the official copy of a CD a friend has burned for me, or that I've downloaded and burned myself. Huh.



posted by: shadowmusic (reply)
post date: 03.26.05 (8:06 am)

For me, the iTunes music store is working out pretty well. I'm able to browse to find new music, and download it for $0.99, and it automagically gets copied over to my iPod.

Last night on the iTunes music store I found a song I liked off Moby's new _Hotel_ album and a kinda-Smiths-sounding song by a band I'd never heard called Tiger Army, based on playlists uploaded by other music store users.



posted by: shadowmusic (reply)
post date: 03.26.05 (8:23 am)

I should add: The songs that I just referred to were Moby's "Where You End" and Tiger Army's "Through the Darkness".

Other recent iTunes Music Store (iTMS) purchases include RJD2's Moby-esque "Smoke & Mirrors", the Softies-esque SnoopDog cover (I kid you not) "Gin & Tonic" by Sissy Bar, "Runaway" by Cub, and "Rollerskate" by Call & Response.



posted by: aqualung (reply)
post date: 03.26.05 (9:08 am)

i find downloading to be kind of a bore. like the other fellow said, i only do it if i absolutely must have the song right then. beyond that, i buy, buy, buy.



posted by: W (reply)
post date: 03.26.05 (9:14 am)

I read the entire thing, not a great article, but it illustrates your point.

I think you know how I feel about downloading. I still do it occasionally, but I prefer to finger though your collection and take what I want.

I'm suddently remembering a special Kate Bush moment.





posted by: newbie (reply)
post date: 03.26.05 (11:45 am)

Reply to: brogonzo

I try really hard to purchase CDs especially from indie-artists who I know are not making a lot of $$ on their music. In writing for LT, and actually getting the chance to talk to some of my favorite bands, I've learned that lots of them still maintain day jobs in order to pay the bills. I'd feel like real sh*t downloading their music when clearly they need every dime they can get. To that end, I think buying directly from the artists it the best way to support them. Why pay a middle man?

Thanks for the comment.




posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 03.26.05 (11:45 am)

Reply to: brogonzo

Ooops! Newbie is me :)



posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 03.26.05 (11:47 am)

Reply to: shadowmusic

Hey! I have some of those freebie itune codes from bottle caps. Want 'em? :)

"the Softies-esque SnoopDog cover (I kid you not) "Gin & Tonic" by Sissy Bar"

I'm still trying to get a handle on this.







posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 03.26.05 (11:48 am)

Reply to: aqualung

I'm pretty much in the same spot. I download very little anymore... and I *really* don't want to admit how much I buy. :)

As always, thanks for stopping by!



posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 03.26.05 (11:49 am)

Reply to: W


All I can do is smile. You know what's mine is yours. Always.





posted by: almsthvn (reply)
post date: 03.27.05 (4:13 pm)

i think i'm a dinosaur. The only things I've downloaded are songs on artist's websites for that purpose. It's more a lack of time or inclination more than anything.



posted by: almsthvn (reply)
post date: 03.27.05 (4:15 pm)

Reply to: juniperflux

Oh my. Do you have the disease my x2B has? Some kind of demonic obsession that he must possess every single piece of music ever recorded?



posted by: ma543zda (reply)
post date: 04.30.08 (10:13 pm)

c875t

Your Name:


Your Comment: