Image hosting by Photobucket
"And at last came the monkey, and anybody could see that man wasn't far off, now."--Mark Twain


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2007 May
2006 October
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February

My Links
Filbert
The Jongleur

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog






"And at last came the monkey, and anybody could see that man wasn't far off, now."--Mark Twain
07.17.05 (5:54 pm)   [edit]
I’ve never been one to write about articles that I see elsewhere. I tend to leave reporting the news to others who seem better suited to summarizing and linking. However, there was an article in today’s New York Times that I simply must talk about.

The article, “Gay Teenager Stirs a Storm,” chronicles the story of a teenager named Zach who, after telling his parents that he was gay, was sent to a place called Refuge: “a religion-based program intended to change the sexual orientation of gay men and women.” Zach’s story gained national attention when he blogged about the reaction of his parents upon breaking the news, and their subsequent belief that sending him to anti-gay boot camp would ”cure” him. (Interestingly, while they refused to comment when asked by the NYT – they have managed to appear on the local christian broadcast channel to tell their story).

To be honest, when I initially read about the camp in the article and their rules about “no brand named clothing” and “mandatory football games” for boys, I giggled a bit. I mean… c’mon the very idea of a program based on the concept that forcing boys to play football will somehow make them slightly less gay just seemed… well, absurd.

But then I read some of the camp’s other rules… and suddenly things became a lot less funny.

Here are just a few:

  • “No continuing education while in the program. Home-school Refuge clients may be allowed to continue their studies during the program, pending approval by LIA staff.”

  • “Clients are to sit in such a way as to not cause another to stumble.”

  • “Clients may have no contact with anyone who has left the program prior to graduating without the blessing of the staff to do so. Clients may address off-limit persons they inadvertently encounter with a polite "hello" only.”

  • “Absolutely no journaling or keeping a diary outside of the MI process unless directed or approved by staff.”

  • “…any belongings, appearances, clothing, actions, or humor that might connect a client to an inappropriate past are excluded from the program. These hindrances are called False Images (FI¹s). FI behavior may include hyper-masculinity, seductive clothing, mannish/boyish attire (on women), excessive jewelry (on men), mascoting, and "campy" or gay/lesbian behavior and talk.”

  • “Refuge participants must submit to an F.I. search every morning.”

  • “Refuge clients are allowed a one-time 15-minute maximum closed bathroom door time for shower/grooming purposes. The only other closed-door alone time allowed is for using the restroom.”


And perhaps the most frightening of all…

  • “No discussing therapeutic issues at home.”


It should be noted that all of the staff of Refuge are men… all of whom seem to have graduated from this or similar programs. Futher, the “leader” of Refuge is a “recovering homosexual” who says that although he “still finds men attractive,” he has been “faithful to his wife for 16 years.”

Honestly, I’m not sure how to feel about all of this. No. Let me amend that. I know how I feel; I’m just not sure who I should hate the most. Should I hate the people running the place? The people who are at best making hands full of money ($2000.00 for 2 weeks) by molding fragile young people into adults who loathe themselves and who are at worst engaging in something far more sinister behind the camp’s closed doors and under the veil of confidentiality? Or should I hate a government that is either unable or unwilling to remove children like Zack from such a place because a) no one is being held against his will and b) Zack’s parents signed on the dotted line. Which brings me to this: Is it the parents who most deserve my hatred? Should I direct my hatred at them for being so afraid of homosexuality that they are willing to subject their own child to an environment that is, minimally unhealthy and most certainly dangerous? Admittedly, hate might not be the most productive use of my emotional energy, but frankly, it’s all I’ve got.

I wish I had some link or some words to impart that offered some sort of a solution. If there is something to be done about this, I’m simply not sure what it is. And… so I find myself writing here because throwing punches in the air is remarkably unsatisfying.

Ironically, Camp Refuge bills itself as a “safe place for teens.” I can hardly think of anything more repulsive.

Relevant Links:

[url=http://www.nytimes.com/2005/0...]NYT story[/url] : (If it asks you to register feel free to use my login).
Login: ruscha
Password: juniper
[url=http://blog.myspace.com/index...]Zack’s blog[/url]
[url=http://thejongleur.tblog.com]Another's[/url] take on the subject: Note how he manages to say in just a few words what it takes me pages and pages to spit out).

~~~~~~~~~

UPDATE

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

“looking big and full of feathers”

 


posted by: TheJongleur (reply)
post date: 07.17.05 (3:34 pm)

I know we have talked about it.. and commented about it..
But thank you for writing.. and for writing as you have.

And..

Thank you for the bird update.



posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 07.17.05 (3:39 pm)

Reply to: TheJongleur

My words + your pictures = pretty good stuff, I think.

I needed to write about this... thanks for tackling it too.

As for the birds... soon, they'll fly the nest and I'll worry. But not nearly as much as I did about the turtle(s).




posted by: lindy (reply)
post date: 07.17.05 (3:47 pm)

Good grief! I got lost in Zack's blog. Man, it's too bad Brennan isn't interested in girls. I'd be willing to overlook the obvious age gap to get to know him a little better! What a brilliant thinker.

I'm feeling a false sense of comfort in having read Zack's blog and finding him to be a young man of strong conviction. He is most assuredly going through all kinds of junk at that joke of a camp, but I suspect he is going to pull through and eventually embrace who he is, though it may take a while.

Obviously, you know I am disgusted by what I read in that article. I tried to read as much as I could of the rules posted, but it was essentially like reading the bible, with additional prison rules thrown in for good measure.

Juni, if you need to direct your anger, frustration and sorrow at any of them, my vote is for the parents. I'd rather end my own life than try to impose such on my children's lives. It is so obvious that these extreme measures are being taken due to an embarrassment felt by the parents, as if they have somehow failed to produce a 'successful' young adult, as if their childrens' gayness is some kind of reflection on themselves. It makes me sick to my stomach that they can't see this and can not let their children grow into who they were born to be. It looks like this camp pits extreme Christians against everyone else. I wonder what atrocities will have to surface as a result of that camp before anyone feels the need to step in and do something about it.

Mrs. Finch's family is looking lovely. She must be so pleased. :)



posted by: therealspartacus007 (reply)
post date: 07.18.05 (5:40 pm)

Yea, I read about it on MySpace. I have to tell you, any group who bans Bach and having personal conversations with one's mother isn't the sort I want to join. This seems even worse than the LDS's MTC.



posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 07.18.05 (10:57 pm)

Reply to: therealspartacus007

Yes. I would have to agree... both of those rules are kind of fishy. Unfortunately, I can't help but think there are far more sinister things going on here.

Thanks for stopping by.

j



posted by: BerlinBear (reply)
post date: 07.19.05 (11:45 am)

Utterly repulsive. I can't muster anything more than contempt and pity both for the parents and the people running the camp. As I said over at tJ's, it seems like one step forward (gay marriage in Canada and Spain) two steps back (this shit). I despair.

I feel a spit in disgust coming on. Grrrrr.



posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 07.19.05 (11:27 pm)

Reply to: BerlinBear

I think one of the worst parts about it for me has been the feeling of utter helpslessness that has accompanied reading about this. Every article I read ends with the same sentiment: no laws have been broken... parents sign their kids up for this... no one is being held against their will.

Like I said... it's all throwing punches in the air.

*sigh*



posted by: jennjr (reply)
post date: 07.22.05 (5:06 am)

I've read this story before, and frankly, it scares the hell out of me.
I have trouble understand a lot of things about the whole situation.
I have trouble understanding how we could live in a 21st century world, and still think that we can (quite literally) scare kids straight.
I have trouble thinking that we call ourselves "civilized" and we'd WANT to try.
I have trouble understanding how a parent can be so desparate to "fix" their child that they completely lost sight of the big picture and instead are inflicting way more harm than good.
I can only hope that Zack, who seems to have his wits about him, will be able to someday overcome the horror of the whole situation, and find a way to right some of the wrongs that were inflicted upon him. I hope his parents can get the help that they so obviously need.

And your little birdies are getting so big!



posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 07.22.05 (5:45 am)

Reply to: jennjr

Jenn... you have really hit the nail on the head with your assessment of a parent's need to "fix" their child. It's sad, really... sad and terrifying. Being an teenager is hard enough, isn't it? Didn't we all struggle, at least a little, with loathing ourselves and those lovely bits of who we are that make us different from everyone else? I just find it difficult to understand parents who would want to feed those kinds of doubts by sending their child to a place whose entire purpose is to point out that who they are is abhorrent and needs to be changed. What kind of parent wants their child to struggle with that kind of negative self-image? Like you, I'm hopeful that Zack will make it through to the other side ok.

But what about all the others?

*sigh*

j



posted by: jennjr (reply)
post date: 07.22.05 (12:41 pm)

Reply to: juniperflux
I guess, in like in Zack's case, we hope for the best.
It scares me to think that these parents are doing this out of love for their children. I can almost construe somemisguided parents logic on this, too: They're so afraid of how little Jimmy or Suzie will be treated as a gay/lesbian out in the world that they want to try to fix the behavior to try to give them a better life, without having to face the ridicule or the stigma that comes with an "alternative lifestyle."

It's just that, well, they've missed the point and are causing their children who are struggling with their sexul identity to feel like even more of a "freak" or "reject" than they already feel like.

I believe that deep down, the parents intentions were good; they were acting out of a fear bone of love, but you know the phrase as well as I do: the road to Hell is paved with good intentions.

I guess the very best scenario we could hope for is that one of these kids comes out of this camp so inspired that they start a camp of their own to de-program these kids.



posted by: juniperflux (reply)
post date: 07.24.05 (1:08 pm)

There's definitely some truth to what you've said here, Jenn... but I'm afraid I don't give the parents and their intentions quite as much credit as you do. TheJongleur and I had a lengthy discussion about this very thing and I agreed with his opinion that parents who would go to the extreme of placing their children in a programming camp for upwards of several months are motivated by more than simply wanting their child to not suffer in an anti-gay world/country. Seems a little like cutting out your child's tongue in order to prevent him from having a lisp.

Of course, I don't have children, so my perspective may be, admittedly, a bit skewed.

That said, Lindy has suggested writing to our legislators in the hopes that maybe enough of a public outcry about such places might force the proprietors to close their doors. However, given that ours is a country that sited keeping gay couples from being able to wed as a more important issue than the war in Iraq during the last presidential election, I'm afraid I'm not too hopeful.

As always, thanks for stopping by and leaving your thoughts.

j

Your Name:


Your Comment: